NONPARAMETRIC LARGE-SAMPLE PAIRWISE COMPARISONSLEVY KJ.1979; PSYCHOL. BULL.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 86; NO 2; PP. 371-375; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

SOME EMPIRICAL POWER, RESULTS ASSOCIATED WITH WELCH'S ROBUST ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE TECHNIQUE.LEVY KJ.1978; J. STATIST. COMPUT. SIMUL.; GBR; DA. 1978; VOL. 8; NO 1; PP. 43-48; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

AN EMPIRICAL COMPARISON OF THE ANOVA F-TEST WITH ALTERNATIVES WHICH ARE MORE ROBUST AGAINST HETEROGENEITY OF VARIANCE.LEVY KJ.1978; J. STATIST. COMPUT. SIMUL.; GBR; DA. 1978; VOL. 8; NO 1; PP. 49-57; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

THE RANDOMIZED RESPONSE TECHNIQUE AND LARGE SAMPLE COMPARISONS AMONG THE PARAMETERS OF K INDEPENDENT BINOMIAL POPULATIONS.LEVY KJ.1977; PSYCHOL. BULL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 84; NO 2; PP. 244-246; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

LARGE-SAMPLE PAIR-WISE COMPARISONS INVOLVING CORRELATIONS, PROPORTIONS, OR VARIANCES = LES COMPARAISONS PAR PAIRE D'ECHANTILLON IMPORTANT IMPLIQUANT DES CORRELATIONS, DES PROPORTIONS OU DES VARIANCESLEVY KJ.1975; PSYCHOL. BULL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 82; NO 2; PP. 174-176; BIBL. 13REFArticle

AN EMPIRICAL COMPARISON OF THE Z-VARIANCE AND BOX-SCHEFFE TESTS FOR HOMOGENEITY OF VARIANCE.LEVY KJ.1975; PSYCHOMETRIKA; E.U.; DA. 1975; VOL. 40; NO 4; PP. 519-524; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

APPROPRIATE SAMPLE SIZES SELECTING THE POPULATION WITH THE LARGEST VALUE OF PI FROM AMONG K BINOMIAL POPULATIONS.LEVY KJ.1975; BRIT. J. MATH. STATIST. PSYCHOL.; G.B.; DA. 1975; VOL. 28; NO 2; PP. 134-137; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

THE RANDOMIZED RESPONSE TECHNIQUE AND LARGE SAMPLE TESTS CONCERNING THE PARAMETERS OF A MULTINOMIAL DISTRIBUTIONLEVY KJ.1980; EDUC. PSYCHOL. MEAS.; ISSN 0013-1644; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 40; NO 3; PP. 701-707; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

NONPARAMETRIC LARGE SAMPLE MANY-ONE COMPARISONSLEVY KJ.1979; J. EXPER. EDUC.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 48; NO 1; PP. 45-49; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

REDUCING THE OCCURRENCE OF OMITTED OR UNTRUTHFUL RESPONSES WHEN TESTING HYPOTHESES CONCERNING PROPORTIONS.LEVY KJ.1976; PSYCHOL. BULL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 83; NO 5; PP. 759-761; BIBL. 3 REF.Article

COMPARING THE VARIANCES OF SEVERAL TREATMENTS WITH A CONTROL.LEVY KJ.1975; EDUC. PSYCHOL. MEASUR.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 35; NO 4; PP. 793-796; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

AN EMPIRICAL COMPARISON OF SEVERAL MULTIPLE RANGE TESTS FOR VARIANCES.LEVY KJ.1975; J. AMER. STATIST. ASS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 70; NO 349; PP. 180-183; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

A PRIORI CONTRASTS UNDER CONDITIONS OF VARIANCE HETEROGENEITY.LEVY KJ.1978; J. EXPER. EDUC.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 47; NO 1; PP. 42-45; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

A MULTIPLE RANGE PROCEDURE FOR INDEPENDENT CORRELATIONS.LEVY KJ.1976; EDUC. PSYCHOL. MEASUR.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 36; NO 1; PP. 27-31; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

SOME MULTIPLE RANGE TESTS FOR VARIANCES.LEVY KJ.1975; EDUC. PSYCHOL. MEASUR.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 35; NO 3; PP. 599-604; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

NONPARAMETRIC APPLICATIONS OF SHAFFER'S EXTENSION OF DUNNETT'S PROCEDURELEVY KJ.1980; AMER. STATISTICIAN; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 34; NO 2; PP. 99-102; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

A MONTE CARLO STUDY OF ANALYSIS OF COVARIANCE UNDER VIOLATIONS OF THE ASSUMPTIONS OF NORMALITY AND EQUAL REGRESSION SLOPESLEVY KJ.1980; EDUC. PSYCHOL. MEAS.; ISSN 0013-1644; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 40; NO 4; PP. 835-840; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

THE RANDOMIZED RESPONSE TECHNIQUE AND APPROPIATE SAMPLE SIZES FOR SELECTING THE POPULATION WITH THE LARGEST VALUE OF PI FROM AMONG K BINOMIAL POPULATIONS.LEVY KJ.1977; BRIT. J. MATH. STATIST. PSYCHOL.; G.B.; DA. 1977; VOL. 30; NO 2; PP. 234-236; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

LARGE-SAMPLE MANY-ONE COMPARISONS INVOLVING CORRELATIONS, PROPORTIONS, OR VARIANCESLEVY KJ.1975; PSYCHOL. BULL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 82; NO 2; PP. 177-179; BIBL. 13REFArticle

A MONTE CARLO COMPARISON OF SEVERAL METHODS FOR ANALYZING SMALL SAMPLE BINOMIAL DATA IN A DISPROPORTIONATE TWO-FACTOR EXPERIMENT WITHOUT REPLICATION.LEVY KJ; NARULA SC.1977; J. STATIST. COMPUT. SIMUL.; GBR; DA. 1977; VOL. 5; NO 3; PP. 239-244; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

PROBABILITY DENSITY PLOTS OF THE NON-CENTRAL T-DISTRIBUTION.LEVY KJ; NARULA SC.1974; INTERNATION. STATIST. REV.; G.B.; DA. 1974; VOL. 42; NO 3; PP. 305-306; BIBL. 2 REF.Article

PROBABILITY DENSITY PLATS OF THE NON-CENTRAL X² AND NON CENTRAL F DISTRIBUTIONS.NARULA SC; LEVY KJ.1975; INTERNATION. STATIST. REV.; G.B.; DA. 1975; VOL. 43; NO 1; PP. 79-82; ABS. FR.; BIBL. 2 REF.Article

TESTING HYPOTHESES CONCERNING PARTIAL CORRELATIONS: SOME METHODS AND DISCUSSIONLEVY KJ; NARULA SC.1978; INTERNATION. STATIST. REV.; GBR; DA. 1978; VOL. 46; NO 2; PP. 215-218; ABS. FRE; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

AN EMPIRICAL COMPARISON OF SEVERAL METHODS FOR ANALYSING DISPROPORTIONATE SUBCLASS DATA IN A TWO-WAY CLASSIFICATION ANOVA.NARULA SC; ABRAMI PF; LEVY KJ et al.1976; INTERNATION. STATIST. REV.; G.B.; DA. 1976; VOL. 44; NO 3; PP. 341-347; ABS. FR.; BIBL. 10 REF.Article